Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2013 Feb;51(2):180–185. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318273119b

Table 1.

Comparison of patient characteristics by level of complexity as measured by the Potential for Benefit Scale and by history of coronary heart disease (n= 1314)1

Total Sample (N=1314) Low (N=327) Patient Complexity2 (PBS Score) Moderate (N=654) High (N=333) p-value3 CHD4 (N=235) History of Coronary Heart Disease No CHD5 (N=1079) p-value6
Age (years) 58.8 (11.4) 59.3 (11.1) 58.5 (11.6) 59.0 (11.1) .521 64.6 (9.0) 57.5 (11.4) <.001
Gender (% male) 40.6 51.1 39.5 32.4 <.001 57.9 36.8 <.001
Education (years) 9.5 (5.0) 11.3 (5.1) 9.1 (5.0) 8.7 (4.6) <.001 10.6 (5.2) 9.3 (4.9) <.001
Duration of diabetes (years) 9.2 (7.5) 7.3 (6.2) 9.3 (7.6) 10.7 (7.8) <.001 10.7 (8.1) 8.9 (7.3) .002
Ethnicity <.001 <.001
 % White 26.5 41.3 23.4 18.6 40.9 23.5
 %Hispanic 54.4 46.8 57.7 59.2 40.4 58.6
 % Vietnamese 19.0 11.9 19.0 22.2 18.7 17.9
Regimen intensity6
 Medication classes prescribed (count) 5.8 (2.2) 5.1 (2.1) 5.7 (2.2) 6.7 (2.6) <.001 7.6 (2.6) 5.4 (2.2) <.001
 On insulin (%) 28.5 18.4 28.3 39.0 <.001 37.0 26.7 .001
 On a statin (%) 77.5 77.1 79.5 73.9 .13 84.7 75.9 .004
1

Table entries are mean values (SD) for continuous variables or proportions for categorical variables.

2

Measured using the 51-item Potential for Benefit Scale (PBS); categories reflect lowest quartile (low), middle 50% (moderate) and highest quartile (high).

3

p-value computed from one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables

4

Patients with a history of coronary heart disease (CHD) noted in the medical record.

5

Patients with no history of CHD noted in the medical record.

6

Data on medication regimen intensity were abstracted from medical records.