Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 22;104(2):488–495. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.12.012

Table 2.

The best performance of each method and the distance from the accuracy limit

Method Best performance (false ratio %) Distance to optimized projection (%)
Packing density 16.36 3.08
CH-plot 22.12 8.84
Pairwise energy 14.48 1.2
TOP-IDP 14.28 1.0
Optimized projection 13.28 0

The best performance of each prediction method was defined as the lowest false ratio under the optimal critical value. The distance from the accuracy limit was measured as the difference between the best performance of each method and that of optimized projection.