. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct 19;25(2):275–285. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001718

Table 3.

Relationships between Latent Class of Subjective Fatigue and Cognitive Function and Everyday Functioning (Parameter Estimate, β ± SE)^a

	Speed of processing^b	Memory	Reasoning	Everyday speed^b	Everyday problem-solving

Time	.0263 ± .0032^***	−.0309 ± .0032^***	−.0352 ± .0025^***	.0346 ± .0043^***	−.0249 ± .0032^***
Subjective fatigue
• Increased fatigue	.0572 ±.0896	.0576 ±.0946	−.0340 ± .0982	−.1969 ± .0933	.1230 ± .0948
• Persistent fatigue	−.0238 ± .0386	.0595 ± .0406	.0437 ±.0420	−.0031 ± .0404	.1560 ± .0408
• Decreased fatigue	−.0934 ± .0942	.1273 ± .0994	.1246 ± .1031	−.0649 ± .0983	.3112 ± .0997^**
• Persistent energy (referent)	0	0	0	0	0
Subjective fatigue × Time
• Increased fatigue × Time	.0337 ± .0179	−.0319 ± .0175^*	−.0471 ± .0141^**	.1050 ± .0235^***	−.0722 ± .0178^***
• Persistent fatigue × Time	.0108 ± .0086	−.0173 ± .0082^*	−.0106 ± .0066	.0118 ± .0111	−.0095 ± .0082
• Decreased fatigue × Time	.0043 ± .0194	.0150 ± .0189	−.0137 ± .0152	−.0290 ± .0255	−.0149 ± .0194
• Persistent energy × Time (referent)	0	0	0	0	0

Note.

controlling for age, race, sex, education, recruitment site, assignment of intervention group, participation in booster sessions, depression, grip strength, and the total number of CVDRFs (estimates not shown).

Higher scores indicate lower abilities.

p < 0.05;

^**

p < 0.01;

^***

p < 0.001.