Table 4.
Estimated sample size in heart failure group to detect the change of ECV and λ with a power of 80%
| Clinical change | Caset 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
SDD1 |
N1 |
SDD2 |
N2 |
SDD3 |
N3 |
| λ (0.063) |
0.078 |
26 |
0.117 |
56 |
0.156 |
98 |
| ECV (0.038) | 0.048 | 27 | 0.072 | 58 | 0.096 | 102 |
Sample size need to detect a clinical meaning change of ECV and λ with 80% of power and an alpha error of 0.05. Sample size is derived from the inter-study SDD as described by Altman [33] and Marchin [32]. Note that for studies comparing active vs. placebo, these sample size numbers need to be doubled. Case 1: the inter-study SDD1 in HF group was estimated 2.8 fold greater than the intra-study SDD; Case 2, the inter-study SDD2 was estimated 1.5 times more than SDD1; Case3, the inter-study SDD3 was estimated 2 times more than SDD1.