Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 20;12:189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-189

Table 3.

Number (%) of authors (n=166) whose authorship statement could not be matched to ICMJE criteria for authorship

Stated contribution No. (%) of authors*
Substantial/direct contribution
94 (56.6)
“Yes”
9 (5.4)
This (case) is interesting
8 (4.8)
We work/collaborate together
8 (4.8)
I am a specialist of/I work in the department for
7 (4.2)
“I am interested in this topic/field”
6 (3.6)
“It was my master degree thesis”
3 (1.8)
“The study carries scientific value”
3 (1.8)
Literature search
3 (1.8)
“I have participated sufficiently to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content”
3 (1.8)
Chief of the project/department
3 (1.8)
Supervisor
2 (1.2)
Coordinator
2 (1.2)
Bibliographical search, administrative and logistic support
2 (1.2)
“I have other related publications as a biostatistician“
2 (1.2)
Signature of the author
2 (1.2)
“My participation in the contribution was administrative and technical support.”
1 (0.6)
“I was responsible for translation of the article.”
1 (0.6)
“I have especially taken part in collecting the literature data, translation.”
1 (0.6)
“This is the first study of its kind.”
1 (0.6)
“On the basis of operational practice and clinical experience which led to this work.”
1 (0.6)
“Because I want to present process of treatment in our institute.”
1 (0.6)
“I am an investigator in scientific project with similar problems.”
1 (0.6)
“Because I believe this is a proper treatment in this situation.”
1 (0.6)
“I was scientific consultant of this research” 1 (0.6)

*Percentages do not add up to 100 because of rounding.