Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 18;13:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-21

Table 2.

Factors associated with VL in a ‘univariate’ model with ‘ward’ as random effect

Factors
No. exposed
OR †
95%CI ‡
P- value
 
Case (%)*
Control (%)*
 
 
 
  (n = 115) (n = 448)      
Adult
95 (82.61)
393 (87.72)
0.68
0.35 – 1.31
0.25
Male sex
66 (57.4)
285 (63.6)
0.65
0.40 – 1.05
0.08
Married
69 (60.0)
325 (72.5)
0.55
0.34 – 0.91
0.02
Hindu religion
99 (86.1)
403 (89.9)
0.78
0.38 – 1.59
0.50
Literate
101 (87.8)
407 (90.9)
0.65
0.31 – 1.41
0.28
Large households (> 5 person)
54 (46.9)
125 (27.9)
2.39
1.46 – 3.93
0.001
Intravenous Drug use
6 (5.2)
13 (2.9)
2.30
0.69 – 7.66
0.17
Proximity to other VL cases within 50 m
52 (45.2)
32 (7.1)
6.60
3.69 – 11.82
<0.0001
Regular forest visit
59 (51.3)
67 (14.9)
6.08
3.49 – 10.61
<0.0001
Daily wage earner (vs fixed employment)
84 (73.0)
240 (53.6)
2.99
1.78 – 5.02
<0.0001
History of migration
66 (57.4)
214 (47.8)
1.75
1.08 – 2.83
0.02
Bed net use ever
83 (73.5)
330 (73.7)
1.06
0.62 – 1.81
0.81
Sleeping on a bed (vs on the floor)
94 (81.7)
439 (97.9)
0.09
0.03 – 0.24
<0.0001
Sleeping upstairs
1 (0.9)
121 (27.0)
0.03
0.01 – 0.21
0.001
Goat ownership
26 (22.6)
75 (16.7)
1.23
0.70 – 2.19
0.48
Cattle ownership
1 (0.9)
26 (5.8)
0.09
0.01 – 0.82
0.03
Pig ownership
34 (29.6)
149 (33.3)
0.86
0.52 – 1.44
0.58
Chickens/ducks ownership
14 (12.2)
76 (16.9)
0.62
0.31 – 1.22
0.16
Type of house
 
 
 
 
 
Thatched house, no windows
33 (28.7)
21 (4.7)
Referent
 
 
Thatched house with windows
62 (53.9)
170 (37.9)
0.28
0.13 – 0.60
0.001
Brick house
20 (17.4)
257 (57.4)
0.05
0.02 – 0.12
<0.0001
Socio economic status (by asset score level)
 
 
 
 
 
Level 1 (poorest)
87 (75.7)
112 (25.0)
Referent
 
 
Level 2
20 (17.4)
112 (25.0)
0.22
0.11 - 0.42
<0.0001
Level 3
7 (6.1)
112 (25.0)
0.09
0.03 - 0.23
<0.0001
Level 4 (least poor) 1 (0.9) 112 (25.0) 0.01 0.001 - 0.08 <0.0001

* Proportion (%) unless specified otherwise.

† OR, odds ratio; ‡CI, confidence interval with ‘ward’ as random effect.