Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Virol. 2012 Dec 21;85(3):524–529. doi: 10.1002/jmv.23498

Table 4.

Ability of Assays to Distinguish NPC Cases from Non-Cases by Anti-EBV ELISA Serology Test - EBV Serology Reproducibility Study

Assay NPC Cases (N=20) % Positivity (GMT among Positives) P-value
Control Group 1 (2+)a (N=32) Control Group 2 (1)a (N=25) Control Group 3 (0)a (N=20)
EBNA IgA 99.2% (420.5) 52.6% (291.5) 32.7% (140.3) 11.7% (126.7) <.0001b
VCAp18 IgA 85.0% (228.9) 72.1% (260.8) 51.3% (207.6) 20.0% (123.1) <.0001b
EA ext IgA 77.5% (191.0) 24.7% (161.0) 17.3% (143.4) 12.5% (130.8) <.0001c
EAp138 IgA 43.3% (178.6) 16.3% (149.8) 12.7% (115.7) 2.5% (110.3) <.0001b
EAd IgA 50.0% (256.9) 12.6% (138.1) 8.7% (123.8) 5.0% (132.3) <.0001c
Zebra IgA 22.5% (220.9) 18.4% (128.9) 13.3% (143.4) 15.8% (139.3) 0.0026b
EA ext IgG 100% (264.2) 73.2% (161.8) 64.7% (143.9) 46.7% (131.9) <.0001c
EAp138 IgG 66.7% (236.9) 36.3% (155.0) 36.0% (142.4) 31.7% (144.5) <.0001b
EAd IgG 76.7% (268.1) 21.1% (193.0) 25.3% (150.2) 20.8% (145.4) <.0001b
Zebra IgG 85.5% (216.8) 63.7% (190.2) 66.7% (174.5) 56.7% (182.2) 0.0004b
a

Controls grouped based on the number of positive results out of three anti-EBV antibody tests as described in the Methods

b

P-value for study group as fixed effect in mixed models also including as random effects, testing date, box, and repeated aliquots of the same person

c

Models including “testing date” as a random effect did not converge; “test day” (coded as 1 or 2) was included as a fixed effect instead.