Table 2.
Species | State |
Fmax (N) |
ɛmax (%) |
E (N) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM | CM/PM | PM | CM | CM/PM | PM | CM | CM/PM | PM | ||
Apple | Dry | 1.22 ± 0.05ab* | 1.09 ± 0.04b | 1.27 ± 0.06a | 3.9 ± 0.3a | 3.5 ± 0.1a | 4.1 ± 0.2a | 49.8 ± 0.5a | 36.9 ± 0.8b | 36.9 ± 1.0b |
Hydrated | 0.83 ± 0.05a | 0.66 ± 0.03b | 0.66 ± 0.02b | 2.9 ± 0.2c | 5.5 ± 0.4b | 9.6 ± 0.4a | 39.1 ± 1.3a | 17.0 ± 0.6b | 10.6 ± 0.5c | |
Pear | Dry | 0.41 ± 0.02b | 0.33 ± 0.02b | 1.09 ± 0.05a | 3.5 ± 0.1b | 3.2 ± 0.2b | 7.4 ± 0.2a | 13.9 ± 0.6b | 12.1 ± 0.7b | 17.8 ± 1.0a |
Hydrated | 0.40 ± 0.02b | 0.31 ± 0.03c | 0.65 ± 0.02a | 3.4 ± 0.2c | 5.5 ± 0.4b | 16.5 ± 0.5a | 15.2 ± 0.9a | 6.4 ± 0.5b | 5.5 ± 0.4b |
*Values represent the means and standard errors of a minimum of 14 replicates (apple) and 16 replicates (pear). Interaction between the state of hydration and type of specimen significant in two-factorial ANOVA for apple and pear (P < 0.0001 for Fmax, ɛmax and E in apple and pear except for Fmax in apple where P < 0.0663). Therefore, one-factorial ANOVA was run and mean comparisons were made within species and state of hydration using Tukey's Studentized range test, P < 0.05.