Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;14(4):413–424. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.4/hjorff

Table II. F-ratios and P-values for analyses of effects of reproductive status (RS: menstrual vs pregnant vs postpartum vs menopausal) and age category (19-27, 28-36, 37-45, 46+) on polysomnographic (PSG) variables, covariate adjustment was applied when the covariate (age, for reproductive status; reproductive status, for age category) was significant at P<. 10. Significant effects (P<.05) are highlighted in bold. * Results of analyses with covariate, where the P-value of the age covariate was P<.10. + Results of analyses with covariate, where the P-value of the RS covariate was P<.10.

Effect of → Reproductive status Age category
PSG variable F(3,130) P F(3,130) P
Total sleep time 0.092* .985* 5.511 .001
Sleep efficiency 3.146 .027 2.401 .071
Sleep latency 2.832 .041 2.905+ .037+
Wake after sleep onset 2.338* .077* 1.258+ .292
Stage 1 % 4.074 .008 2.482 .064
Stage 2 % 0.885* .451* 3.450+ .019+
Stage 3 % 7.930 .0001 7.203+ .001+
Stage 4 % 2.055* .109* 8.592+ .0001+
Slow-wave sleep % 4.838* .003* 9.386+ .0001+
REM % 1.364 .257 1.771 .156
REM latency .0460 .711 0.257 .856
REM density 3.404* .020* 1.766 .157