Did the exposure or hazards periods of risk make reasonable biologic and/or clinical sense? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Have the investigators made attempts to independently validate the exposure factor(s) of interest? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Have an adequate number of incident cases been selected and are only persons with an initial disease event being studied? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Was effect modification potentially taking place in various pre-defined subgroups? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Was there potential for recall bias of the key exposure factor of interest? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Were patients interviewed at an appropriate time in their course of disease and setting to give as accurate a set of responses as possible? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Have differences in absolute from relative risk been clearly distinguished? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Were the study findings clearly presented and adequately interpreted? |
□ |
□ |
□ |
Were the study strengths and limitations clearly acknowledged? |
□ |
□ |
□ |