Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 24.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Res. 2011 Jan;69(1):74–79. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181fcb285

Table 1.

Clinical and imaging data of the patients

Patient Age (y)/
gender
Duration of
epilepsy (y)
FSIQ Fine motor
function
T scores
Affected
brain
region
1 4.3/M 3.9 75 29 1FTPO
2 8.9/M 7.1 76 10 rTPO
3 11,3/F 9.6 57 1 rP
4 12.4/M 10 47 −9 rFTPO
5 7/M 6.5 47 −65* 1FTPO
6 3/F 2.2 128 36 rP
7 8.9/M 8.6 82 −65* 1T(P)0
8 8.1/F 7.9 55 −65* 1FTPO
9 6/F 5.7 60 −64 1FTPO
10 4.5/F 2.5 91 35 1(T)P
11 9.5/F 8.6 60 −65* rFTPO
12 6.3/M 5.6 55 46 rFTPO
13 4.1/F 3.6 102 34 1Tt
14 3.6/F NA 112 75 1Tt
15 9.5/M 8.9 93 23 1P
*

Fine motor function could not be assessed because of severe motor impairment in four subjects; the lowest score minus 1 (−65) was assigned to them; only scores measured contralateral to the brain involvement are listed.

t

These patients did not have leptomeningeal angioma; however, glucose PET showed left temporal hypometabolism and left facial angioma; intracranial involvement was further confirmed by the presence of clinical seizures or epileptiform discharges on scalp EEG.

NA, not applicable (this patient had only interictal spikes); M. male; F, female; 1, left; r, right; F, frontal; T, temporal; P, parietal; O, occipital. Letters in parenthesis indicate mild/partial involvement of the lobe.