Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;79(2):543–552. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02362-12

Table 3.

Verification of FAE assay performance with DNA from selected hydrocarbon-impacted enrichments and environmental samples

Sample Region Reference(s) Environment, sample type Substrate(s) Expected FAE lineage Resultsa
bssA-nmsA sensu lato
nmsA sensu stricto with FAE-N assA with FAE-KM
bssA FAE-B
Paclele Mici mud volcano Romania 28 Terrestrial, enrichment Hexadecane assA +
Amon mud volcano Mediterranean Sea, Nile deep-sea fan 42 Marine, sediment Methane, ethane, propane, butane assA-like? +b
Nyegga methane seeps Norwegian continental ridge 32 Marine, sediment Methane, natural gas assA-like? +
Chapopote asphalt volcano station GeoB106-17-6 Gulf of Mexico 42, 43 Marine, sediment Asphalt, alkanes, aromatics, methane FAE + + +
Hydrocarbon seep station 161 Gulf of Mexico 30, 42 Marine, sediment Oil, asphalt, alkanes, aromatics FAE +b +b +b +
Guaymas Basin hydrocarbon seep Gulf of California 42 Marine, sediment Methane, alkanes, aromatics FAE, especially assA +b +b
Gölzau aquifer, former refinery Germany 29 Terrestrial, enrichment Toluene bssA + +
Butane assA + + + +
Methylnaphthalene nmsA + +
Flingern aquifer, former gas work site Germany 25 Terrestrial, sediment BTEX, PAHc bssA-nmsA sensu lato +b +b +b +d
a

+, a clear amplicon with the expected size was observed; −, no amplicon.

b

Amplicons were actually cloned and sequenced as displayed in Fig. 1.

c

PAH, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon.

d

Forty PCR cycles were necessary to obtain an amplicon.