Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;51(2):591–594. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02482-12

Table 2.

Diagnostic yield of vortexing and sonication fluid culture, depending on two cutoff values (≥1 CFU/ml and ≥50 CFU/ml fluid)a

Cutoff value No. (%) of PJI (n = 35) No. (%) of AF (n = 100) % sensitivity (95% CI) % specificity (95% CI) % PPV (95% CI) % NPV (95% CI) % PLR (95% CI) % NLR (95% CI)
Cutoff ≥ 1 CFU/ml
    Sonication fluid 25 (71)c 7 (7)d 71 (54–85) 93 (86–97) 78 (60–91) 90 (83–95) 10 (5–21) 0 (0–1)
    Vortexing fluid 24 (69) 8 (8)b 69 (51–83) 92 (85–96) 75 (57–89) 89 (82–95) 9 (4–17) 0 (0–1)
Cutoff ≥50 CFU/ml
    Sonication fluid 21 (60) 1 (1)e 60 (42–76) 99 (95–100) 95 (77–99) 88 (80–93) 60 (8–430) 0 (0–1)
    Vortexing fluid 14 (40) 1 (1)e 40 (24–58) 99 (95–100) 93 (68–99) 83 (75–89) 40 (5–293) 1 (0–1)
a

PJI, prosthetic joint infection; AF, aseptic failure; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio.

b

Propionibacterium acnes (n = 5), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 2), Corynebacterium spp. (n = 1).

c

In 4 of 25 (16%) cases, sonication cultures grew <50 CFU/ml. In all 4 cases, patients had previously received antimicrobial treatment (3 cases were caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci and 1 by Pasteurella multocida).

d

P. acnes (n = 5), coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 2).

e

Corynebacterium spp. (n = 1).