Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan-Feb;48(1):92–98. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.1.03

Table 3.

Hierarchical Regression Model of Subjective Well-Beinga (N = 224)


Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
B
β
B
β
B
β
B
β
Constant 5.02b 5.29b 5.19b 5.30b
Sex –0.14 –0.03 –0.46 –0.11 –0.39 –0.10 –0.37 –0.09
Injury severity –0.23 –0.07 –0.29 –0.09 –0.26 –0.08 –0.27 –0.09
Hope pathways 0.48b 0.24 0.42b 0.22 0.43b 0.22
Hope agency 0.40b 0.20 0.36b 0.18 0.38b 0.19
Social support 0.25b 0.13 0.22 0.11
Hope path × social support –0.43b –0.22
Hope agency × social support 0.07 0.03
R2 0.01 0.17 0.18 0.22
Adjusted R2 0.00 0.15 0.16 0.20
Changed in R2 0.16b 0.01 0.04b
a

Dependent variable: subjective well-being.

b

P < .05.