Table 2.
Outcomes and between group comparisons across time for peak pressure, forefoot pressure time integral, total contact area and forefoot rate of loading
|
Outcome |
Custom-made functional |
Prefabricated |
Overall significance* |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Baseline |
6-months |
Baseline |
6-months |
(all randomised) |
||||||||
| Actual | % | 95% CI | Actual | % | 95% CI | Actual | % | 95% CI | Actual | % | 95% CI | ||
|
Peak pressure reduction kPa |
189 |
37 |
40, 33 |
239 |
37 |
42, 33 |
199 |
35 |
39, 31 |
187 |
31 |
34, 26 |
F=2.687 |
| |
(111) |
(15) |
|
(171) |
(14) |
|
(115) |
(15) |
|
(141) |
(17) |
|
Eta2=0.023 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p=0.104 |
|
Forefoot pressure time integral reduction kPa.sec |
14 |
27 |
29, 24 |
18 |
30 |
32, 27 |
12 |
22 |
25, 20 |
15 |
24 |
26, 21 |
F=11.276 |
| |
(10) |
(11) |
|
(12) |
(10) |
|
(7) |
(8) |
|
(12) |
(10) |
|
Eta2=0.089 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p=0.001 |
|
Total contact area increase mm2 |
4285 |
32 |
30, 35 |
2443 |
15 |
13, 16 |
3827 |
29 |
27, 32 |
2395 |
15 |
14, 16 |
F=1.66 |
| |
(1464) |
(10) |
|
(1147) |
(5) |
|
(1183) |
(9) |
|
(803) |
(5) |
|
Eta2=0.014 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
p=0.20 |
|
Forefoot rate of loading reduction KPa/sec |
4 |
3 |
6, 0.4 |
7 |
4 |
8, 0.6 |
7 |
6 |
9, 3 |
6 |
3 |
6, 0.7 |
F=0.225 |
| |
(11) |
(13) |
|
(16) |
(14) |
|
(13) |
(11) |
|
(17) |
(13) |
|
Eta2=0.002 |
| p=0.636 | |||||||||||||
Values are mean and (SD).
% is the actual difference expressed as a percentage of ‘no-insole’.
*ANOVA; significance of difference in % change between custom-made functional and prefabricated insoles over 6 months.