Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 24;7(1):e2008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002008

Table 1. Prevalence of intestinal schistosomiasis in preschool-aged children.

Diagnostic approach Low transmission Moderate transmission High transmission
Baseline Follow-up Baseline Follow-up Baseline Follow-up
N 333 245 337 252 255 238
Faecal microscopy 7.2 (4.7–10.5) 6.9 (4.1–10.9) 16.9 (13.0–21.4) 25.0 (19.8–30.8) 38.8 (32.8–45.1) 47.5 (41.0–54.0)
Light infections (1–99 epg) 6.3 (4.0–9.5) 6.5 (3.8–10.4) 10.4 (7.3–14.1) 17.0 (12.6–22.3) 24.3 (19.2–30.1) 27.3 (21.8–33.4)
Moderate infections (100–399 epg) 0.9 (0.2–2.6) 0.4 (0.0–2.3) 4.7 (2.7–7.6) 4.8 (2.5–8.2) 7.8 (4.9–11.8) 9.3 (5.9–13.7)
Heavy infections (≥400 epg) 0.0 (0.0–1.1) 0.0 (0.0–1.5) 1.8 (0.7–3.8) 3.2 (1.4–6.2) 6.7 (3.9–10.5) 10.9 (7.3–15.6)
Single urine CCA 45.9 (40.5–51.5) 39.6 (33.4–46.0) 45.4 (40.0–50.9) 44.8 (38.6–51.2) 56.1 (49.8–62.3) 55.9 (49.3–62.3)
trace reaction 27.9 (23.2–33.1) 26.1 (20.7–32.1) 25.8 (21.2–30.8) 24.6 (19.4–30.4) 26.3 (21.0–32.1) 16.8 (12.3–22.2)
+ reaction 13.8 (10.3–18.0) 11.0 (7.4–15.6) 13.1 (9.7–17.1) 15.1 (10.9–20.1) 14.5 (10.4–19.4) 17.2 (12.7–22.6)
++ reaction 3.6 (1.9–6.2) 1.6 (0.4–4.1) 2.4 (1.0–4.6) 3.6 (1.6–6.7) 5.1 (2.7–8.6) 11.8 (8.0–16.6)
+++ reaction 0.6 (0.0–2.2) 0.8 (0.0–2.9) 4.2 (2.3–6.9) 1.6 (0.4–4.0) 10.2 (6.8–14.6) 10.1 (6.6–14.6)
SEA-ELISA 36.0 (30.9–41.4) 18.4 (13.7–23.8) 49.0 (43.5–54.4) 52.8 (46.4–59.1) 81.6 (76.3–86.1) 92.0 (87.8–95.1)
+ reaction 32.7 (27.7–38.1) 18.4 (13.7–23.8) 40.1 (34.8–45.5) 48.8 (42.4–55.2) 61.6 (55.3–67.6) 78.2 (72.4–83.2)
++ reaction 3.3 (1.7–5.8) 0.0 (0.0–1.5) 8.9 (6.1–12.5) 4.0 (1.9–7.2) 20.0 (15.3–25.4) 13.9 (9.7–18.9)
Combined tests 64.0 (58.6–69.1) 47.3 (40.9–53.8) 68.2 (63.0–73.2) 65.9 (60.0–71.7) 89.4 (85.0–92.9) 94.1 (90.3–96.7)
‘Triplicate sample microscopy’ 17.0 (12.9–22.3) 16.6 (11.9–22.9) 32.0 (26.2–38.4) 43.4 (36.1–50.9) 60.5 (53.4–67.2) 69.7 (62.9–75.9)

Prevalence (and CI95), in %, of intestinal schistosomiasis according to the different diagnostic tests employed (faecal microscopy, single urine CCA and SEA-ELISA), the combined results for all tests (if positive for any test then considered child as positive), as well as the mathematical model by Jordan and colleagues (‘Triplicate stool samples microscopy’) [29]. This study was conducted in three epidemiological settings in Uganda in October/November 2009 (baseline) and 2010 (follow-up). For each stool sample, duplicate Kato-Katz thick smears were performed.