Table 3.
Association between the prevalence of dental caries and black stains in children aged 5 in Pelotas, Brazil (logistic regression analysis, n = 1,120)
Variable/category | Model 1 |
Model 2 |
Model 3 |
Model 4 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | <p | OR (95% CI) | <p | OR (95% CI) | <p | ||
Sex | 0.051 | 0.030 | 0.046 | 0.006 | |||||
Male | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
Female | 0.78 (0.62–0.99) | 0.76 (0.60–0.97) | 0.76 (0.59–0.98) | 0.68 (0.52–0.88) | |||||
Family income at birth | – | 0.002 | 0.003 | 0.001 | |||||
1st quartile | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
2nd quartile | 0.85 (0.60–1.19) | 0.93 (0.66–1.32) | 1.06 (0.74–1.50) | ||||||
3rd quartile | 0.63 (0.45–0.89) | 0.65 (0.46–0.93) | 0.75 (0.52–1.07) | ||||||
4th quartile | 0.59 (0.39–0.89) | 0.63 (0.41–0.96) | 0.55 (0.35–0.87) | ||||||
Mother's educational level at birth, years | – | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
≤4 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||
5–8 | 0.86 (0.58–1.27) | 0.93 (0.62–1.39) | 0.86 (0.58–1.28) | ||||||
9–11 | 0.61 (0.41–0.93) | 0.71 (0.46–1.10) | 0.66 (0.43–1.02) | ||||||
≥12 | 0.44 (0.25–0.77) | 0.56 (0.31–1.02) | 0.29 (0.15–0.56) | ||||||
Sweet consumption | – | – | 0.004 | 0.002 | |||||
Less than once a day | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||||
Once a day | 0.89 (0.64–1.24) | 0.89 (0.63–1.26) | |||||||
Twice a day | 1.14 (0.78–1.62) | 1.13 (0.78–1.65) | |||||||
Three times or more a day | 1.90 (1.30–2.76) | 1.90 (1.31–2.76) | |||||||
Sweet drinks consumption | – | – | 0.030 | – | |||||
Less than once a day | 1.00 | – | |||||||
Once a day | 0.77 (0.53–1.13) | ||||||||
Twice a day | 0.89 (0.60–1.31) | ||||||||
Three times or more a day | 1.46 (1.07–2.00) | ||||||||
Black stains | 0.192 | 0.055 | 0.050 | 0.021 | |||||
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
Yes | 0.63 (0.33–1.22) | 0.52 (0.26–0.99) | 0.49 (0.25–0.96) | 0.41 (0.19–0.87) |
Model 1: adjusted by gender; model 2: adjusted by model 1 + maternal education + family income; model 3: adjusted by model 2 + sweet consumption frequency (candies and drinks); model 4: final model (model 3) with dmfs ≥3 as the outcome.
p value of Hosmer-Lemeshow test: model 3 = 0.834; model 4 = 0.557. Pseudo R2: model 3 = 0.060; model 4 = 0.07.