Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 23;20(2):1124–1134. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1191-7

Table 7.

Antioxidant concentrations (nmol –SH g−1 fresh weight, μmol GSH g−1 fresh weight, μmol proline g−1 fresh weight) in the leaves and stems of V. faba plants grown on soil contaminated with heavy metals

Glutathione Non-protein –SH groups Proline
Leaves Stems Leaves Stems Leaves Stems
Pb 38.1 ± 0.7a,b 42.3 ± 2.1a,b 270.4 ± 16.7a,b 145.9 ± 6.8a,b 0.8 ± 0.06a,b 0.4 ± 0.02a
Cd 16.4 ± 0.4a 29.6 ± 0.3a 247.2 ± 2.0a,b 89.1 ± 3.6a,b 0.8 ± 0.03a,b 0.4 ± 0.02a
Cu 16.7 ± 1.2a,b 40.1 ± 0.9a,b 290.8 ± 5.5a 205.1 ± 12.4a,b 0.6 ± 0.02a 0.2 ± 0.02a
Ni 30.3 ± 0.9a 42.1 ± 0.5a,b 311.4 ± 14.2a 147.7 ± 4.4a,b 2.7 ± 0.04a,b 2.2 ± 0.02a,b
Zn 79.4 ± 7.8a,b 36.4 ± 0.9a 278.1 ± 11.1a,b 93.0 ± 4.0a,b 3.2 ± 0.01a,b 2.2 ± 0.02a,b
C 29.5 ± 1.5 31.9 ± 3.1 309.8 ± 13.5a 123.3 ± 8.5a 0.5 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.01

aDenotes significant differences between the antioxidant concentrations in the leaves and stems data in one variant of contamination

bDenotes significant differences between the heavy metal concentrations in plants grown in the contaminated soil and the control (p < 0.05)