Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;25(1):79–89. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2013.01.07

Table 3. Cox proportional hazard regression model analysis of all the patients.

Variables Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Relative risk 95% CI P Relative risk 95% CI P
Gender
   Male vs. female 0.827 0.530-1.289 0.402
Age, years
   ≤60 vs. >60 1.243 0.816-1.771 0.351
Site
    Non-cardiac cancer vs. cardiac cancer 1.630 1.045-2.542 0.031
Size
   ≤4 cm vs. >4 cm 1.489 0.977-2.270 0.064
Lauren
   Intestinal 1.606 0.732-3.526 0.237
   diffuse 2.582 1.154-5.777 0.021
   mixed 1.000 0.018
Differentiation
    Well-moderate vs. poor 1.501 1.002-2.247 0.049
Lymphovascular invasion
   Absent vs. present 2.370 1.593-3.527 0.000
Depth of invasion
   T1+T2 vs. T3+T4 3.935 1.725-8.974 0.001
Lymph node metastasis
   N0 vs. N1+N2+N3 2.737 1.425-5.258 0.003 0.280 0.098-0.801 0.020
Distant metastasis
   No vs. Yes 5.008 3.235-7.754 0.000 2.701 1.602-4.554 0.001
TNM stage
   I+II vs. III+IV 6.215 3.393-11.384 0.000 11.364 3.980-34.012 0.000
LGR5 expression
   Negative vs. positive 0.974 0.662-1.431 0.892