Table 1.
Jadad scale for quality assessment of RCT (High quality RCT presenting ≥ 3 points).
Jadad scale | Heitz-Mayfield et al., 2011 | Thöne-Mühling et al., 2010 | Ramberg et al., 2009 |
---|---|---|---|
1. Randomisation | |||
Reported | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Adequately | 1 | 1 | |
Inadequately | |||
Not reported | |||
| |||
2. Double-blinding | |||
Reported | 1 | 1 | |
Adequately | 1 | 1 | |
Inadequately | |||
Not reported | 0 | ||
| |||
3. Withdrawal/Dropouts | |||
Reported | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Not reported | |||
| |||
Quality point | 5 | 3 | 4 |
allocation concealment was reported in all the three studies