Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios for the associations of psychosocial and demographic variables with Internet access and use of the Internet as a source of cancer information, respectively, in an immigrant Latino population cared for in safety net clinics

	Internet access*				Intent to use Internet as cancer information source**
		OR	95% CI	p		OR	95% CI	p
Age (years)	<50 vs. ≥ 50	1.74	[1.24, 2.45]	.002	Per 10-year increase	0.65	[0.53, 0.80]	<.001
Gender	Female vs. male	1.45	[1.08, 1.95]	.01	Female vs. male	0.68	[0.43, 1.06]	.09
Marital status	—	—	—	—	Married vs. unmarried	0.73	[0.46, 1.16]	.18
Education (years)	12 vs. <12	2.02	[1.43, 2.86]	<.001	12 vs. <12	2.24	[1.27, 3.93]	.01
	>12 vs. <12	3.39	[2.27, 5.07]	<.001	>12 vs. <12	3.22	[1.79, 5.80]	<.001
Perceived risk of cancer	—	—	—	—	High vs. low	1.76	[1.14, 2.73]	.01
Self-efficacy	Per one-unit increase	1.10	[1.01, 1.22]	.05	Per one-unit increase	1.24	[1.06, 1.44]	.01
Acculturation	Per one-unit increase	2.60	[1.97, 3.42]	<.001	Per one-unit increase	1.60	[1.14, 2.23]	.01
Trust in online health information	Per one-unit increase	1.68	[1.51, 1.88]	<.001	Per one-unit increase	1.47	[1.19, 1.82]	.0004

^*Adjusted results from a logistic regression model that included all listed predictors and country of origin (N = 1,092). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: p = .886.

^**Adjusted results from a logistic regression model that included all listed predictors and country of origin (N = 428). Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test: p = .511.