Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;5:19–27. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S36785

Table 5.

Unadjusted and adjust hazard ratios for IUD discontinuation at 10 months, by sociodemographic and other reproductive health risk factors

Characteristics Unadjusted HR (95% CI) P-value Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-value
Province
Sindh 1 1
Punjab 1.42 (0.99–2.04) 0.056 1.84 (1.21–2.81) 0.005
Age distribution (years)
≤25 1 1
>25–35 2.62 (1.37–5.02) 0.004 4.83 (2.32–10.07) <0.001
>35–49 1.39 (0.58–3.35) 0.458 2.96 (1.09–8.08) 0.034
Education level
No formal education 1 1
Primary 0.93 (0.62–1.41) 0.744 0.81 (0.53–1.23) 0.323
Secondary 1.30 (0.78–2.15) 0.315 1.33 (0.77–2.31) 0.310
Intermediate and post-secondary 1.63 (0.71–3.78) 0.252 2.06 (0.85–4.99) 0.117
Number of live children
1–2 1 1
3–4 0.93 (0.57–1.52) 0.785 0.62 (0.36–1.06) 0.078
5+ 1.12 (0.70–1.82) 0.646 0.65 (0.37–1.12) 0.117
Type of IUD
Multi-load 1 1
Copper-T 1.27 (0.78–2.04) 0.335 1.48 (0.88–2.49) 0.138
Contraception use before IUD insertion
Using a contraceptive method 1 1
Not using any method 1.43 (1.00–2.06) 0.050 2.41 (1.63–3.55) <0.001
Experienced side effects post-IUD insertion
No 1 1
Yes 7.22 (4.66–11.21) <0.001 9.78 (6.21–15.38) <0.001
Reason for choosing IUD (most influential)
Suggested by someone 1 1
Self-perceived 0.88 (0.55–1.39) 0.794 0.94 (0.58–1.52) 0.794

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio; IUD, intrauterine device.