Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 3;20(1):83. doi: 10.1186/2008-2231-20-83

Table 2.

Outcome data of the children with functional constipation, in two groups of cassia fistula emulsion and mineral oil, before and after medication

  Before medication First week Second week Third week
Defecation /w (±SD)
Cassia fistula
1.7(±1.3)NS
10.7(±6.4)c
11(±6)c
10.6(±5.7)c
Mineral oil
2(±1.7)
5.8(±4.3)
5.8(±4.3)
6.1(±4.5)
Fecal Incontinence /w (±SD)
Cassia fistula
19.2 (±21.7)NS
4.9(±10.4)NS
3.9(±10.1)NS
3(±9.1)NS
Mineral oil
16.6 (±18.7)
6.1(±11.5)
6.3(±11.8)
6.4(±11.1)
Retentive Posturing/w (±SD)
Cassia fistula
17.7 (±19.9)NS
6.8(±14.5)NS
6(±12.5)NS
4.1(±8.9)NS
Mineral oil
15.3 (±17.7)
5.9(±9.6)
5.5(±9.9)
4(±8.8)
severity of pain (VAS) (±SD)
Cassia fistula
60.9(±21.5)NS
19.8(±17.8)a
9.5(±11.7)c
4.8(±8.5)c
Mineral oil
58.1(±22.6)
31.5(±23.1)
24.8(±21.1)
20.1(±19.9)
consistency of stool (VAS) (±SD)
Cassia fistula
71.9(±11.9)NS
24.2(±21)c
16.2(±16.9)c
11.9(±16.8)b
Mineral oil
70(±15)
42.1(±22.8)
32.3(±24.2)
25.4(±22)
Acceptance and Tolerance (±SD) Cassia fistula
-
2.8(±1.7)NS
2.5(±1.5)NS
2.2(±1.5)NS
Mineral oil - 2.7(±.5) 2.4(±1.4) 2.4(±1.3)

/w: per week, VAS: Visual Analog Scale, NS: Not Significant, ap < 0.05 vs mineral oil, bp < 0.01 vs mineral oil, cp < 0.001 vs mineral oil.