Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 22;12:26. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-26

Table 4.

Seven samples (six patients) with discordant results between the different methods

Patient Microscopy Parasitaemia by microscopy 18S PCR assays Mitochondrial PCR/sequencing Primary/recurrent infection Place of infection Interpretation
P 1
Negative
01
Pm
Pm
Primary
Ghana
Pm overlooked by microscopy
P 2
Negative2
01
Pv
Pv
Primary
New Guinea
Pv overlooked by microscopy
P 2
Pf, Pv
or Pk
1%
Pv
Pv
Recurrent (Relapse)
New Guinea
Inconclusive/ incorrect diagnosis by microscopy
P 3
Pf + Po
<1%
Po
Po
Recurrent (Relapse)
Uganda
Over-diagnosed mixed infection by microscopy
P 4
Pf
<1%
Pf + Pm
Pf
Primary
Liberia
Under-diagnosed mixed infection by microscopy/sequencing
P 5
Pf + Pv
1%
Pv
Pv
Primary3
SEA or CA
Over-diagnosed mixed infection by microscopy
P 6 Pf 4 <1% Negative Pf Recurrent (Recrudescence) Guinea Un-detected low Pf parasitaemia by 18S PCR

Abbreviations: Pf, Plasmodium falciparum; Pv, Plasmodium vivax; Po, Plasmodium ovale; Pm, Plasmodium malariae; Pk, Plasmodium knowlesi; SEA, South east Asia; CA, Central America.

1 Not detected any parasites.

2 Positive microscopy two days later (1% parasitaemia) and then the patient was diagnosed with severe malaria and treatment initiated.

3 Not given hypnozoite-eradicating treatment and re-admitted four weeks later with relapse of Plasmodium vivax.

4 Only one parasite detected.