Scenario 1 (reduction to background) |
Traffic proximity |
–100% |
–17.8% |
0% |
Decrease by 27,100 (4,900, 51,200) |
8% (2%, 16%) |
Dispersion-modeled near-roadway NOx |
–100% |
–2.56 ppb |
0 ppb |
Decrease by 39,800 (6900, 65,600) |
12% (2%, 20%) |
NO2 |
Decrease to background levels |
–19.3 ppb |
4 ppb |
— |
— |
O3 |
Decrease to background levels |
–3.03 ppb |
36.3 ppb |
— |
— |
Scenario 2 (reduced regional pollution and near-roadway
exposure) |
Traffic proximity |
–3.6% |
–3.6% |
14.2% |
Decrease by 5,900 (1,000, 11,800) |
2% (0.3%, 4%) |
Dispersion-modeled near-roadway NOx |
–20% |
–0.51 ppb |
2.05 ppb |
Decrease by 8,400 (1,400, –14,300) |
3% (0.4%, 4%) |
NO2 |
–20% |
–3.9 ppb |
19.4 ppb |
— |
— |
O3 |
–20% |
–0.61 ppb |
38.7 ppb |
— |
— |
Scenario 3 (reduced regional pollution, increased
near-roadway exposure) |
Traffic proximity |
3.6% |
3.6% |
21.4% |
Increase by 5,900 (1,000, 11,800) |
2% (0.3%, 4%) |
NO2 |
–20% |
–3.9 ppb |
19.4 ppb |
— |
— |
O3 |
–20% |
–0.61 ppb |
38.7 ppb |
— |
— |
aIncrease or decrease in asthma cases attributable to
near-roadway pollution. |