Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 24;6:10.3402/gha.v6i0.19252. doi: 10.3402/gha.v6i0.19252

Table 2.

Capacity, M&E knowledge and HIV M&E scale and sub-scale scores

Scales and sub-scales All managers (n=51) Horizontal managers (n=20) Vertical managers (n=31) Significance#
Data collection (sub-scale score: 0–9)
 Mean (SD) 5.24 (3.2) 6.50 (2.6) 4.42 (3.4) 0.016*
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 58.2 72.2 49.1
Data collation (sub-scale score: 0–16)
 Mean (SD) 8.24 (4.2) 10.10 (3.0) 7.03 (4.4) 0.005**
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 51.5 63.1 43.9
Data analysis (sub-scale score: 0–13)
 Mean (SD) 3.43 (3.6) 4.60 (1.0) 2.68 (0.5) 0.098
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 26.4 35.4 20.6
Data use (sub-scale score: 0–14)
 Mean (SD) 8.59 (3.12) 6.75 (5–10) 9.77 (9–12) 0.002**
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 61.4 48.2 69.8
Overall M&E function (scale score: 0–52)
 Mean (SD) 25.49 (8.8) 27.95 (8.6) 23.90 (8.6) 0.108
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 49.0 53.8 46.0
Management capacity (scale score: 0–13)
 Mean (SD) 6.12 (2.4) 5.85 (2.0) 6.29 (2.7) 0.534
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 47.1 45.0 48.4
HIV M&E knowledge (scale score: 0–13) (n=47) (n=19) (n=28)
 Mean (SD) 8.11 (3.4) 6.58 (3.2) 9.14 (3.3) 0.011*
 Mean score as % of maximum possible score 62.4 50.6 70.3

SD, standard deviation.

#

Two-sided t-test.

*

p<0.05.

**

p<0.01.