Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 26;141(2):314–323. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812000635

Table 6.

Composition of the risk-based surveillance scenarios

Criteria Points Testing interval by points score No. of herds (%) bTB (RHT)*
Improved
Slaughtering <25% of stock +1 0 points = no testing 2687 (22·9) 26 (1)
1 point = 4 year testing 8052 (68·6) 52(26)
Receiving ‘high risk’ animals in >3 years and slaughtering <50% of stock +1 2 points = 2 year testing 991 (8·4) 20 (9)
Similar
Slaughtering <25% of stock and/or receiving ‘high risk’animals in >3 years and slaughtering <40% of stock 1 0 points = no testing 2788 (23·8) 29 (1)
1 point = 4 year testing 8942 (76·2) 69 (35)
Lower detection 1
Slaughtering <12·5% of stock and/or receiving ‘high risk’ animals in >3 years and slaughtering <25% of stock 1 0 points = no testing 4658 (39·7) 55 (15)
1 point = 4 year testing 7072 (60·3) 43 (21)
Lower detection 2
Slaughtering >25% of stock −1 −1 or 0 points = no testing 4971 (42·4) 19 (3)
Slaughtering <5% of stock +1 1 point = 4 year testing 5340 (45·5) 58 (22)
Receiving ‘high risk’ animals in >3 years +1 2 points = 2 year testing 1288 (11·0) 20 (11)
Having >100 animals +1 3 points = annual testing 131 (1·1) 1 (0)

bTB, Bovine tuberculosis; RHT, routine herd testing.

*

bTB is the number of confirmed breakdowns between 2003 and 2008 that fell into that category. RHT is the breakdowns that were detected by RHT.