Table 1.
Summary of different job satisfiers in public vs. private sectors, for specialists
Category | Public satisfiers | Private satisfiers |
---|---|---|
Rewards |
+ Good benefits (for example, paid sabbatical leave, state pension), stable income |
+++ Much better pay generally (depending on level of specialization) |
Physical environment |
++ More predictable working hours - less ‘selling availability’ |
|
|
|
+++ Higher resource availability (incl. vis. other health workers) |
|
|
++ Greater sense of career path or progression through more prestige and recognition |
Social environment |
+++ More collegial relations among doctors |
|
|
+ Good relations with managers (in H1, not necessarily elsewhere) |
+++ Fewer stresses with ‘the administration’ and National/provincial DoH through self-employment |
|
++ Patients less demanding, and less patient contact |
++ Patients viewed as more compliant, more patient contact |
|
|
+++ More positive social relations with other health and hospital workers |
Work itself |
+++ Opportunities for research and teaching (in academic settings) |
|
|
+++ More opportunities for ‘challenge’, variety, and feeling ‘needed’ or relevant |
+ More ‘straightforward’ and less complicated cases (valued by some) |
|
|
+ Opportunity for state-of-the-art medical practice experience |
+++ More autonomy and ability to influence working environment |
Source: qualitative evidence.
Note: ‘+’ signs signify estimates/guesses from the author of how important each job aspect appeared to respondents in the qualitative case study, with a score between 1(+) and 3(+++). Higher scores were accorded based around popularity of the issues and how clear and strong arguments were in their favor.