Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 29;4:23. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00023

Table A1.

Average interval estimate (ms) for each interval length in the intentional causal and unintentional causal conditions.

100 ms 400 ms 700 ms
Intentional causal 354 (26) 569 (21) 705 (22)
Unintentional causal 348 (26) 596 (26) 739 (22)

SEM in parentheses.

A 2 (intentionality: intentional causal/unintentional causal) × 3 (interval length: 100/400/700 ms) repeated measures ANOVA conducted on these data (Table A1) shows a near-significant main effect of “intentionality,” F(1, 15) = 3.75, p = 0.072, a significant main effect of “interval length,” F(2, 30) = 137.73, p < 0.001, and no significant interaction between these factors, F(2, 30) = 2.01, p = 0.15.