Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Dec 28;53(1):230–240. doi: 10.1021/ci300510n

Table 2.

Performance of methods on DUD using experimental structures in non-cross docking

Method (Binding database) Average EF0.01 Average EF0.05 Average EF0.1 Average AUAC
FINDSITEX (DrugBank) 6.26 3.77 3.11
FINDSITEX (ChEMBL) 7.03 4.49 3.13
FINDSITEfilt (PDB) 11.2 5.54 3.86
FINDSITEcomb 13.4 6.56 4.37 0.774
AUTODOCK Vina 4.80 (5.3×10−4)a 3.01 (9.4×10−4) 2.40 (7.7×10−4) 0.586 (3.0×10−7)
DOCK 6 3.72 (1.5×10−4) 1.79 (1.8×10−5) 1.24 (9.9×10−7) 0.426 (1.3×10−12)
a

Numbers in brackets are two-sided p-values of Student-t test between FINDSITEcomb and docking methods.