Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Dec 20;53(1):267–277. doi: 10.1021/ci300505n

Table 6.

Comparison of free energy terms with different selections of the anchoring atoms.

Ligand #§
ΔGintsite+ΔΔGt,r
benzene C1 −5.4 ± 0.3
C2 −5.3 ± 0.4
C3 −5.9 ± 0.2

indole C1 −9.0 ± 0.1
C2 −8.5 ± 0.1
C3 −8.8 ± 0.2

n-butylbenzene C1 −8.4 ± 0.2
C2 −9.5 ± 0.2
C3 −8.2 ± 0.3

SB3 C1 −24.0 ± 0.5
C2 −23.6 ± 1.4
C3 −25.7 ± 1.0

SBX C1 −22.7 ± 0.7
C2 −22.3 ± 0.8
C3 −23.0 ± 1.1

FK5 C1 −50.6 ± 0.8
C2 −49.2 ± 1.0
C3 −49.4 ± 1.5

Units of free energies are kcal/mol. The errors of all the free energy values are standard deviation of the last five cycles of FEP/MD, each started with the last snapshot of previous cycle and random velocities.

§

C1, C2, and C3 represent independent FEP/MD simulations for each ligand.