Table 4.
Allellic diversity of each MIRU-VNTR locus
| Locus | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | HGDI | |
| 2 | M | 1 | 60 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| S | – | 33 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
| 4 | M | – | 61 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| S | – | 31 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
| 10 | M | 1 | 18 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 4 | – | – | – | 70% |
| S | – | 16 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1 | – | – | 66% | ||
| 16 | M | 4 | 16 | 32 | 8 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 64% |
| S | 2 | 2 | 18 | 10 | 1 | – | – | – | – | 59% | |
| 20 | M | 2 | 59 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10% |
| S | 3 | 30 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14% | |
| 23 | M | – | – | – | – | 6 | 55 | – | – | – | 16% |
| S | – | – | – | 1 | – | 32 | – | – | – | 10% | |
| 24 | M | 61 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0.02% |
| S | 33 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 | |
| 26 | M | – | 2 | 2 | 6 | 24 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 78% |
| S | – | – | – | 7 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 6 | – | 76% | |
| 27 | M | – | 3 | 3 | 55 | – | – | – | – | – | 17% |
| S | – | – | 1 | 30 | 2 | – | – | – | – | 14% | |
| 31 | M | 1 | 1 | 40 | 8 | 11 | – | – | – | 51% | |
| S | – | – | – | 20 | 6 | 7 | – | – | – | 45% | |
| 39 | M | – | – | 44 | 17 | – | – | – | – | – | 42% |
| S | – | 1 | 20 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – | 52% | |
| 40 | M | 3 | 5 | 41 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – | 50% |
| S | 1 | 4 | 25 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 38% | |
MIRU-VNTR: Mycobacterial Interspersed Repetitive Units Variable Number Tandem Repeat; S strain (Susceptible), M strain (Resistant)