Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 15;33(3):715–726. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21242

Table II.

Errors in the estimation of activation %ΔCMRO2 with calibrated‐BOLD, using recent experimental measurements of CBF and BOLD responses to hypercapnia and activation

Study Brain region Hypercapnia Activation Estimated ΔCMRO2 (%)a %ΔCMRO2 %ΔCBF
ΔCBF (%) ΔBOLD (%) ΔCBF (%) ΔBOLD (%) δCO2 = 0 δCO2 = −0.11 δCO2 = 0 δCO2 = −0.11
Perthen et al., 2008 Visual cortex 48 2.6 48 1.2 18.5 14.0 0.39 0.29
Ances et al., 2008 Visual cortex 71 2.08 78 0.89 32.5 28.4 0.42 0.36
Ances et al., 2008 Basal ganglia 42 1.52 32 0.13 20.3 19.6 0.64 0.61
Leontiev et al., 2007 Visual cortex 66 2.52 82 1.81 21.5 13.6 0.26 0.17
a

Calculated from the Davis model [Eq. (1)] with the assumption that the fractional change in CMRO2 with hypercapnia is δCO2. The standard assumption is δCO2 = 0, and the calculations were repeated assuming that the fractional decrease in CMRO2 is identical to the observed fractional decrease in MEG power in the gamma band (δCO2 = −0.11).