Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 30.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2010 Sep 19;13(10):1271–1275. doi: 10.1038/nn.2640

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Estimating the presynaptic membrane potential from spiking information. (a) Sample trace (black) of the presynaptic membrane potential generated by an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. When the membrane potential exceeds a soft threshold, action potentials (vertical black lines) are generated. The optimal estimator of the presynaptic membrane potential (red line, mean estimate u^t; red shading, one s.d. σt) closely matches an optimally tuned canonical model of short-term plasticity11 (blue). Inset shows a magnified section. (b) EPSP amplitude of the optimal estimator (red, mean ± s.d.) and of the canonical model of short-term plasticity (blue, mean ± s.d.) as a function of the estimator uncertainty σ2. Note that EPSP amplitudes in the biophysical model tend to be smaller than those in the optimal estimator, which is compensating for a somewhat slower decay in the biophysical model (see inset in a). (c) The dynamics of the scaled uncertainty σ2σmax2 (red) closely match the resource variable xt of the canonical model of STP (blue), σ2.