Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;103(2):347–354. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300899

TABLE 3—

Final Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model for Time to First Dental Examination for Medicaid-Enrolled Children (n = 6322) in Iowa: 2000–2008

Model Covariate Hazard Ratio (95% CI) P
Main predictor variables
WBV frequency
 Period 1 0.97 (0.93, 1.02) .203
 Period 2 2.96 (1.41, 6.15) .004
 Time-dependent covariate: Period 2 * [log(time) − mean log(time)] 0.76 (0.63, 0.93) .006
 Period 3 1.25 (1.14, 1.36) <.001
Age at first well baby visit
 Rate of the first WBV 6.07 (0.79, 46.65) .083
 Interaction between the rate of the first WBV and the time at which the first WBV took place 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) .64
Ascribed factors
Sex .243
 Female 0.95 (0.86, 1.04)
 Male (Ref) 1.00
Race
 White (Ref) 1.00
 Non-White 1.14 (1.02, 1.28) .02
 Unknown or missing 1.16 (0.89, 1.53) .276
At risk for developing a chronic condition .443
 No (Ref) 1.00
 Yes 0.96 (0.87, 1.07)
Eligibility for Medicaid through the Supplemental Security Income Program .281
 No (Ref) 1.00
 Yes 0.82 (0.57, 1.18)
Proximal factors
Saw different medical providers for WBVs .001
 No (Ref) 1.00
 Yes 0.10 (0.02, 0.41)
 Time-dependent covariate: Saw different medical providers for WBVs * [log(time) − mean log(time)] 0.56 (0.38, 0.83) .004
Immediate factor
Mother used any preventive dental care in the 12 mo before the child was born <.001
 No (Ref) 1.00
 Yes 1.40 (1.25, 1.57)
Intermediate factor
Rurality
 Metropolitan (Ref) 1.00
 Urban adjacent to metropolitan 1.00 (0.89, 1.14) .956
 Urban nonadjacent to metropolitan 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) .458
 Rural 1.16 (0.96, 1.41) .133
Distal factor
Lived in a dental Health Professional Shortage Area .207
 No (Ref) 1.00
 Yes 0.94 (0.85, 1.04)

Note. WBV = well baby visit.