TABLE 2—
Social Capital Perception Differences Among Ciclovia and Cicloruta Participants or Users: Bogotá, Colombia, October 2009
| Variables | Ciclovia, No. (%) | Cicloruta, No. (%) | χ2 (P) |
| Program participants or users are willing to help each other | 9.1 (.01) | ||
| Agree | 623 (62.4) | 563 (56.3) | |
| Neutral | 238 (23.8) | 258 (25.8) | |
| Disagree | 138 (13.8) | 179 (17.9) | |
| Program participants or users get along with each other | 46.2 (< .001) | ||
| Agree | 614 (61.4) | 472 (47.2) | |
| Neutral | 257 (25.7) | 309 (30.9) | |
| Disagree | 129 (12.9) | 218 (21.8) | |
| Program participants or users can be trusted | 34.6 (< .001) | ||
| Agree | 410 (41) | 319 (31.9) | |
| Neutral | 353 (35.3) | 330 (33) | |
| Disagree | 236 (23.7) | 351 (35.1) | |
| Program participants or users share values | 22.7 (< .001) | ||
| Agree | 339 (33.9) | 424 (42.4) | |
| Neutral | 339 (33.9) | 296 (29.6) | |
| Disagree | 321 (32.2) | 280 (28) | |
| Program participants or users would help you to fix a flat tire or to get up if you fell | 481.5 (< .001) | ||
| Agree | 730 (73.2) | 280 (28) | |
| Neutral | 152 (15.3) | 176 (17.6) | |
| Disagree | 115 (11.5) | 544 (54.4) |