Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 30;8(1):e55341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055341

Table 4. Study 2: Hierarchical regression analyses predicting empathy T3.

Empathy T2 Empathy T3
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
Control variables
Age −.07 −.08 −.07 −.04 −.04 −.02
Gender −.05 −.04 −.04 .05 .05 .07
Narrative Experience .05 .05 .05 .01 .00 −.01
Empathy T1 .89*** .88*** .88*** .81*** .81*** .82***
Positive Affect .06 .02 .02 .09 .06 .09
Negative Affect .07 .08 .07 .12 .14* .12
Narrative Understanding .12 .11 .11 .05 .05 .04
Attentional Focus −.10 −.10 −.10 −.14 −.12 −.12
Independent variables
Condition −.08 −.07 −.06 −.03
Emotional Transportation .06 .03 −.03 −.17
Interaction Effect
Emotional Transportation * Condition .04 .18*
F 51.56*** 41.56*** 37.50*** 36.91*** 29.41*** 28.26***
ΔF 51.56*** 1.10 .30 36.91*** .64 4.56*
R2 .82 .83 .83 .77 .77 .79
ΔR2 .82 .00 .00 .77 .00 .01

Note. N = 97. Standardized regression coefficients are reported. Gender: 1 = male, 2 = female; Condition: 0 = control; 1 = fiction. *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001.