Table 3.
Outcomes | Complications* | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
Study | Clinical outcome studied | Occurrence (%) | Major complications | Minor complications |
Atwell 200833 | Technical successa following a single ablation session | 97% | Worsening preexisting hypertension (0.90%); pulmonary edema (0.90%); large hematomas requiring angiography and transfusion of red blood cells (2.7%); pulmonary embolus (0.90%)and hematuria requiring ureteral stent placement (090%) | |
| ||||
Finley 200834 | CSS among patients with biopsy proven RCC during a median follow-up of 11.4 and 13.4 months
|
100% and 100% | Hemorrhage requiring transfusion (13.5%); blood transfusions (16.2%); internal jugular vein thrombus (2.7%); small bowel injury (2.7%) and loss of kidney (2.7%) | |
Treatment failure rateb among patients with biopsy proven RCC during a median follow-up of 11.4 and 13.4 months | 5.3% and 4.2% | |||
| ||||
Georgiades 200835 | Technical successc | 100% | Silent, small perinephric hematoma; large, painful perinephric hematomas; intercostal nerve injury; genitofemoral nerve injury; | |
Overall CRd | 97.5% | |||
| ||||
Hinshaw 200836 | Effectiveness ratee for laparoscopic CA | 93.3% | Severe respiratory distress (1.1%); intraoperative bowel injury (1.1%) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (1.1%) | Asymptomatic perinephric hematoma; asymptomatic and self-limited urine leak; self-limited flank paresthesia and neuralgia; and intercostal neurapraxia (4.4%). |
| ||||
Lehman 200837 | Tumour recurrences | Group 1: 0% | Group 1: no complications (0%) | |
Group 2: 4.8% | Group 2 (62%): mortality (4.5%); cerebrovascular accident; myocardial infarction; pulmonary embolism and; hemorrhage with blood transfusion | |||
| ||||
Nguyen 200838 | Tumour recurrences | CA 7.4% RFA 25% |
Intraoperative complications: CA: renal arterial injury (21%); RFA: no major intraoperative complications reported on this group (0%) |
Intraoperative complications: CA: diaphragmatic injury (7.1%); pleurotomy (requiring chest tube) (7.1%) and peritoneotomy (21%) RFA: no major intraoperative complications reported on this group (0%) |
Postoperative complications: CA: no major postoperative complications reported on this group (0%). | Postoperative complications: CA: urinary leak and anephric state (7.1%). | |||
RFA: no major postoperative complications reported on this group (0%). | RFA: no major postoperative complications reported on this group (0%). | |||
| ||||
Weight 200839 | Radiographic successf at 6-months follow-up | CA 90% RFA 85% |
NR | NR |
Radiographic successf with biopsy and 6-months imaging | CA 89% RFA 81% |
|||
| ||||
Atwell 2007a,b40,41 | Technical successg | 95% | Large hemorrhage and transient renal failure (necessitated temporary dialysis) (2.5%) | |
| ||||
Bandi 200742 | Overall, CSSh and RFSi rates | 88.5%, 100% and 98.7%, respectively | Atrial fibrillation (1.2%); respiratory failure (1.2%) and; urine leak (1.2%); bleeding (1.2%); bowel injury (1.2%); symptomatic perirenal haematoma (1.2%) and neurophatic pain (1.2%) | |
| ||||
Cestari 200743 | NR | NR | Minimal intraoperative blood loss (100%); intraoperative renal fracture (2.3%); postoperative anemia (8.1%); transitory hyperpyrexia (6.9%); hematoma (2.3%); pulmonary edema (1.1%); gross hematuria (1.1%) and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (1.1%) | |
| ||||
Littrup 200744 | Technical successj | 98% | Perinephric hematoma; hematuria and ureteral stricture. Major and minor complications were seen in 6% and 22% procedures, respectively | |
| ||||
Lokken 200730 | Occurrence of applicator track nodules | CA 2.7% | CA: small perinephric hematoma (0.3%) | |
RFA 1.7% | RFA: self-limited hematuria and small perinephric hematoma (0.3%) | |||
| ||||
Weld 200745 | 3-year CSS rate | 100% | Hemorrhage (3.2%); urinary leak (3.2%); gross hematuria (3.2%); ileus (3.2%); perinephric urinoma (3.2%); hydronephrosis (3.2%); blood clots (3.2%); atrial fibrillation (3.2%); and heart failure (3.2%) | |
Mean increase of ablation zone size on follow-up CT or MRI at 3 months. | 14 | |||
Mean decrease of ablation zone size on follow-up CT or MRI at 3 months | 71 | |||
| ||||
Wright 200729 | Treatment failuresk | 6% | No major and minor complications were found (0%) | |
| ||||
Davol 200646 | Complete radiologic resolutionl from a total of 40 patients available in the analysis | 85% | There were no major adverse events found (0%) | There were 7 minor adverse events (14.5%) |
Treatment failurem from a total of 40 patients available in the analysis | 12.5% | |||
CSS rate in a total of 32 patients | 100% | |||
CSS rate after a single CA procedure in a total of 32 patients | 84.3% | |||
| ||||
Hegarty 200647 | Radiologic evidence of tumour recurrence or persistence of disease; | CA 1.8% | CA: congestive heart failure (0.62%); myocardial infarct (0.62%); required thoracotomy for hemothorax (0.62%). | CA: required temporary ureteral stent insertion (1.2%) |
RFA 11.1% | ||||
CSS | CA 98% at a median 3-year follow-up | RFA: no major complications were reported in the RFA group (0%). | RFA: NR | |
RFA 100% at 1-year median follow-up | ||||
| ||||
Lawatsch 200648 | Overall tumour recurrence rate per patient | 5.9% in 34 patients | Intraoperative complications: open surgery conversion (3.3%); nephrectomy for bleeding (1.6%); myocardial infarction (1.6%); pneumothorax (3,3%) | |
Recurrence rate per lesion treated in patients with biopsy confirmed RCC | 5.1% for 38 lesions | Postoperative complications: perinephric hematoma (1.6%); pulmonary embolus (1.6%) and ileus (3.3%) | ||
| ||||
Matin 200649 | Overall survival rate in all patients from both groups | 82.5% | NR | NR |
2-year metastasis-free survival rate in all patients from both groups | 97.4% | |||
| ||||
Schwartz 200650 | No growth or evidence of recurrence on CT scan or MRI at 3 months | 98.18% | Renal fracture (1.2%); stroke (1.2%) and hydronephrosis (1.2%) | |
Radiographic enhancement after the procedure | 3.6% | |||
Desai 200551 | Local recurrence at a mean follow-up time of 5.8 months in LPN group and 24.6 months in CA group | LPN 0.6% | LPN associated with greater blood loss and a higher incidence of delayed complications after hospital discharge compared with CA 16.3% versus 2.2%, respectively | |
CA 3% | ||||
Gill 200527 | 3-year CSS (in a total of 51 patients with sporadicunilateral renal tumour) | 98% | NR | NR |
Cestari 200452 | Mean reduction of cryolesions on MRI 12 and 18 months of follow-up | 73% and 76% (in a total number of patients 32 and 30, respectively) | Transitory hyperthermia (8.1%); hematoma (8.1%); gross hematuria (2.7%); low postoperative pain (100%); and ureteropelvic junction obstruction (2.7%) | |
Gill 200053 | Follow-up CT-directed needle negative biopsies at 3 to 6 months in a total of 23 patients | 100% | Perirenal hematoma (3.1%) and herpes esophagitis (3.1%) |
CSS: cancer-specific survival; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; CR: complete response; CA: cryoablation; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; RFS: recurrence-free survival; CT: computed tomography; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.
Percentages were calculated on a patient number basis;
Extension of the ice ball beyond the tumour margin and post-ablation images showing no contrast enhancement in the tumour parenchyma;
Not defined;
Completion of the cycle of a 10-minute freeze, 8-minute active thaw, and 10-minute repeat freeze with the ice ball covering the entire lesion and extending at least 5 mm beyond its border;
Complete lack of enhancement of a previously enhancing mass;
Complete ablation of macroscopic tumour as shown at imaging follow-up;
No evidence of central or nodular enhancement after treatment;
Extension of the ice ball beyond the tumour margin and postablation imaging findings of no contrast enhancement in the area encompassing the original tumour;
Absence of death from renal cancer;
No evidence of radiographic recurrence at the site of CA, regardless of the lesion pathology;
Not defined;
Continued contrast enhancement on postoperative CT;
An involuted scar or fibrosis without evidence of growth or enhancement on the most recently available imaging study;
Growth of a persistent renal mass, as well as the persistence or development of heterogeneous peripheral enhancement within any persistent mass.