Table 5. Outcome of one-factorial ANOVAs of familiar size of MGA.
MGA | F | p-value | Partial η2 | Effect size | Sample size | Corr. among rep measures | Critical F | Power | |
Matchboxes Germany | All | 5.107 | 0.031 | 0.145 | 0.4118 | 32 | 0.85539 | 4.17 | 1 |
B | 0.19 | 0.669 | 0.12 | 0.3692 | 16 | 0.80199 | 4.54 | 0.99 | |
M | 5.948 | 0.028 | 0.284 | 0.6298 | 16 | 0.85805 | 4.54 | 1 | |
Matchboxes Scotland* | All | 11.33 | <0.005 | 0.34 | 0.72 | 24 | 0.82 | 4.30 | 1.00 |
ANOVAs were calculated for both visual conditions and corresponding results of post-hoc power analyses of MGA were computed with G*power 3. The effect size was computed using the actual partial η2 of our data for the binocular and monocular condition and for the partial η2 that was reported by McIntosh & Lashley [11].Power analyses are based on the a priorily chosen α error probability threshold of 0.05. *data from McIntosh & Lashley [11].