Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 26;12:234. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-234

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical correlates of suicidal ideation in young people presenting for mental health care

 
No suicidal ideation (n = 336)a
“Life not worth living” (n = 77)b
Thoughts of death or Suicidal ideation (n = 81)c
Significance Test [p]
Post hoc
          a vs. b a vs. c b vs. c
Females, n (%)
145 (43%)
41 (53%)
53 (65%)
χ2 (2, 493) = 13.6 [.001]
na
na
na
Age, years
19.9 ± 4.6
19.4 ± 4.1
20.0 ± 4.1
F (2, 493) = 0.4 [.706]
 
 
 
Age of onset, years
15.4 ± 4.7
15.4 ± 4.8
14.1 ± 3.7
F (2, 397) = 2.5 [.086]
 
 
 
Predicted IQ
100.6 ± 11.7
101.4 ± 9.2
102.9 ± 9.5
F (2, 147.6) = 1.6 [.212]
 
 
 
Education, years
11.5 ± 2.8
11.5 ± 2.5
11.5 ± 2.5
F (2, 489) = 0.1 [.942]
 
 
 
SOFAS
62.4 ± 12.0
58.0 ± 11.2
57.0 ± 11.7
F (2, 387) = 7.2 [.001]
*
**
 
HDRS total
8.7 ± 5.7
14.8 ± 5.6
19.0 ± 5.6
F (2, 476) = 120.7 [.000]
***
***
***
BPRS total
36.7 ± 8.6
43.7 ± 9.8
49.2 ± 10.5
F (2, 475) = 67.8 [.000]
***
***
***
K10 total
23.0 ± 7.4
30.4 ± 7.8
33.5 ± 6.1
F (2, 424) = 73.8 [.000]
***
***
*
AUDIT total 6.9 ± 7.7 7.5 ± 8.6 8.2 ± 8.5 F (2, 491) = 0.9 [.399]      

Note: Final columns provide the results of the post-hoc Scheffe’s pairwise comparisons (with corresponding significance levels: * < .05; ** p < .01; *** p < .001) where ‘a’ denotes the “No suicidal ideation” group (i.e. HDRS item-3 score = 0); ‘b’ denotes the “Life not worth living” group (i.e. HDRS item-3 score = 1) and ‘c’ denotes the “Thoughts of death or Suicidal ideation” group (i.e. HDRS item-3 score >1). SOFAS = Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale; HDRS = Hamilton Depression rating Scale; BPRS = Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale; K-10 = Kessler-10; AUDIT = Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test.