Table 5.
Fit indices for the EFA models vs. WHO four-factor models of the original WHOQOL-BREF
|
Fit indices |
Our EFA models |
WHO 4-factor models |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Healthy referents |
Patients with TB |
Healthy referents |
Patients with TB |
| 4F model | 6F model | 4F model | 4F model | |
| Number of parameters |
71 |
84 |
84 |
84 |
| Discrepancy (χ2) |
359.648* |
370.850* |
533.099* |
568.568* |
| (df) |
(204) |
(215) |
(293) |
(293) |
| Relative chi-square |
1.763 |
1.725 |
1.819 |
1.941 |
| CFI |
0.864 |
0.862 |
0.808 |
0.775 |
| RMSEA |
0.077 |
0.072 |
0.08 |
0.082 |
| AIC | 501.648 | 538.85 | 701.099 | 736.568 |
Notes: df = degree of freedom; 4F model = 4-factor model; 6F model = 6-factor model; CFI = Comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error; AIC = Akaike index. Ideal fit indices are nonsignificant discrepancy (p > .05), relative chi-square < 3, CFI > .9, RMSEA ≦ .08, lower AIC.
* p < .001.