Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 12;12:297. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-297

Table 2.

Clinical success rates by study population at the test-of-cure visit

  Tigecycline CE population N = 209 (%) Comparator CE population N = 196 (%) Difference (Tigecycline vs Comparator)(95% CI)
Clinical diagnoses*
Deep soft tissue infections
114/150 (76.0)
103/132 (78.0)
-2.0 (-12.6, 8.5)
Major abscess
30/36 (83.3)
34/43 (79.1)
4.3 (-15.5, 24.0)
Infected ulcers
17/22 (77.3)
15/20 (75.0)
2.3 (-28.3, 32.9)
Other populations
Diabetes mellitus
46/60 (76.7)
46/66 (69.7)
7.0 (-10.0, 24.0)
Peripheral vascular disease
20/27 (74.1)
16/20 (80.0)
-5.9 (-34.4, 22.5)
Prior antibiotic failure 27/35 (77.1) 26/34 (76.5) 0.7 (-22.1, 23.5)

*Includes 2 CE patients with burns: 1 tigecycline cure and 1 comparator failure; Calculated using asymptomatic method corrected for continuity. CE, clinically evaluable; CI, confidence interval.