Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec 11;1828(3):1057–1065. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.12.003

Table 1.

Geometrical properties of the phospholipids employed in this work

Lipid Charge S a02) lc (Å) V3) References
DPhPC 0 Cylindricala S ~1.00 80.5 13.6 1095 [49;51]
DPhPS −1 Cylindricala S ~1.06 Unknown Calculated ~79b Unknown 13.6c Unknown 1095c [49;51;53;79]
DPhPE 0 Conea S ~1.20 Unknown Calculated ~67b Unknown 13.6c Unknown 1095c [49;51;53;79]
SM (16:0) 0 Truncated Conea S ~0.51 41d Calculated 21.78e Calculated 457.8e [48;52]
PE (in ECTPL) 0 Conef ~52 Unknownf Unknownf [49;53;80]
PG (in ECTPL) −1 Cylindricalf ~66 Unknownf Unknownf [49;53;80]
CL (in ECTPL) −2 Cylindricalf Unknown Unknownf Unknownf [49;80]
a

The shapes of DPhPC, DPhPS, DPhPE and SM are estimated by a dimensionless shape parameter, S, given by S= V/a0lc [49].

b

Lipid surface areas of DPhPC and DPhPS are estimated from [51;53], namely, the lipid surface area of diCnPS and diCnPE is 62 Å2 and 52 Å2, respectively [51], which are 22% smaller than those of each DPh-form lipids [53]. a0 (DPhPS) = 62/(1−0.22) = 79.4 Å2, a0 (DPhPE) = 52/(1−0.22) = 66.7 Å2

c

The hydrocarbon lengths and volumes of DPhPS and DPhPC are estimated to be same as DPhPC.

d

This value is derived from the fully hydrated C16:0 SM at 29 °C.

e

These values are approximated by the following formula [48]:

V~(27.4+26.9n)3lc~(0.154+0.1265n)×10
f

lc and V of PE, PG and CL are unknown, because these are natural lipids extracted from E. coli. The shapes of these lipids are referred in [49;80].