Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;3:1178. doi: 10.1038/srep01178

Table 1. Summary of results from the different model implementations in this study.

Baseline model–mean temperature
Start day Kernel Proportion spread mean (sd) farms affected mean (sd) cattle infected mean (sd) sheep infected mean (sd) ewes at risk*
30 Gaus 0.009 5.51 (2.89) 2.93 (1.92) 2.59 (1.80) 0.00 (0.01)
Exp 0.01 5.52 (2.90) 2.94 (1.95) 2.59 (1.80) 0.00 (0.01)  
60 Gaus 0.983 368 (242) 172 (161) 379 (351) 13.0 (18.2)
Exp 0.981 300 (203) 275 (295) 401 (427) 12.8 (20.2)  
90 Gaus 0.982 52.0 (47.4) 21.2 (39.1) 38.3 (67.5) 0.73 (7.09)
Exp 0.980 46.3 (31.3) 26.9 (52.0) 31.9 (51.4) 0.57 (5.44)  
120 Gaus 0 5.49 (2.87) 2.93 (1.93) 2.56 (1.77) 0.00 (0)
Exp 0 5.49 (2.86) 2.94 (1.94) 2.55 (1.77) 0.00 (0)  

*Ewes at risk of reproductive losses.