Table 2.
Listener/Group/Condition | Accuracy in Task 1 (% (SD) | F0 Height | F0 Contour | Peak Intensity Ratiob | Duration Ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full spectrum | |||||
CI-1 | 78.33 | 0.0632 | 2.2657** | 0.0610* | 0.3557 |
CI-2 | 94.17 | 0.2506 | 6.1637** | 0.1251** | 1.5800** |
CI-3 | 98.33 | 0.0306 | 6.1041** | −0.0565** | −0.2227 |
CI-4 | 98.33 | 1.9140** | 4.5714** | 0.1580** | −2.6335** |
CI-5 | 63.33 | 0.2162 | 1.7730** | 0.1786** | 0.8243** |
CI-6 | 95.83 | 0.6709** | 3.2154** | 0.0069 | −1.0834** |
CI-7 | 96.67 | −0.8591** | 7.1140** | 0.0448* | −0.2085 |
CI-8 | 65.83 | 0.5551* | 2.4198** | 0.0194 | 0.5151* |
CI-9 | 95.83 | 3.7448** | 4.8787** | 0.1713** | −2.4352** |
CI-10 | 93.33 | 2.1612** | 2.6967** | 0.2812** | 1.2774** |
CI-11 | 58.00 | 1.4831** | 1.1909** | 0.2747** | 1.2549** |
CI-12 | 85.00 | 2.7837** | 4.3230** | 0.0068 | −0.7333* |
CI-13 | 75.00 | 1.9817** | 2.2823** | 0.1977** | 1.8613** |
CI group | 84.46 (14.68 | 0.8141** | 2.3968** | 0.0841** | 0.0952 |
NH-1 | 100.00 | 0.5218 | 5.9949** | 0.0191 | −0.8503* |
NH-2 | 95.00 | 1.4088** | 5.0620** | 0.0095 | −0.0733 |
NH-3 | 96.67 | 0.8809** | 5.4048** | −0.0065 | 1.0125* |
NH-4 | 99.17 | 0.2879 | 9.2178** | −0.0144 | 0.6219 |
NH group | 97.71 (2.29 | 0.7123** | 5.2470** | 0.0025 | 0.1294 |
Acoustic CI simulations (group data only)c | |||||
16-channel | 91.25 (1.98 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
8-channel | 84.79 (9.75 | 1.5452** | 2.5262** | 0.1317** | 1.5280** |
4-channel | 80.63 (10.77 | 0.6000* | 1.9564** | 0.1170** | 1.4540** |
1-channel | 69.38 (12.70 | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Note: CI = cochlear implant; NH = normal hearing; NA = not applicable/not tested.
The equation used to derive the estimated coefficients is as follows: Expected logarithm of odds of question response = Intercept ( (A) × F0 height (=1 if 220 Hz; =0 if 120 Hz) ( (B) × F0 contour (in octaves) ( (C) × peak intensity ratio (in dB) ( (D) × log (duration ratio), where (A), (B), (C), and (D) in this equation refer to the estimated coefficient listed in column entitled F0 height, F0 contour, peak intensity ratio, and duration ratio, respectively.
Rather than using duration ratio, which was restricted to positive values, logarithm of duration ratio was adopted since it theoretically took values on all real numbers, and thus, it was more appropriate in a logistic model setting.
Only group data are shown for acoustic CI simulations, as estimated coefficients were quite consistent across NH listeners.
p < .05. **p < .001.