Table 1.
microRNAs | miRBase analysis | Target Scan analysis | miR and a analysis | PicTar analysis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Score | Energy | Context score | Aggregate PCT | Score | Pearson’s correlation | PicTar score | Probabilities | |
has-miR-23b | 17.985 | −26.99 | ||||||
has-miR-23a | 17.8792 | −26.64 | ||||||
has-miR-185 | 17.3502 | −27.89 | ||||||
has-miR-612 | 17.2231 | −34.49 | ||||||
has-miR-593 | 17.1937 | −20.28 | ||||||
has-miR-770-5p | 17.1637 | −20.26 | ||||||
has-miR-922 | 17.0584 | −20.99 | ||||||
has-miR-502-5p | 16.7981 | −21.99 | ||||||
has-let-7b | 16.6096 | −21.77 | ||||||
has-miR-657 | 16.5319 | −24.35 | −0.11 | – | ||||
has-miR-337-3p | 16.5038 | −20.58 | ||||||
has-miR-331-3p | 16.3728 | −21.06 | −0.34, −0.20 | – | ||||
has-let-7a | 16.3728 | −16.00 | ||||||
has-miR-129-5p | 16.3728 | −22.03 | ||||||
has-miR-516a-3p | 16.3214 | −22.76 | ||||||
has-miR-378 | 16.2665 | −23.91 | ||||||
has-let-7f-1 | 16.1865 | −22.83 | ||||||
has-miR-422a | 16.1865 | −23.67 | −21.20 | −0.46 | ||||
has-miR-125a-5p | 16.1436 | −16.37 | −0.25 | 0.136 | ||||
has-miR-888 | 16.0807 | −19.08 | ||||||
has-miR-499-5p | 16.0539 | −18.55 | ||||||
has-miR-181b | 16.0054 | −23.88 | ||||||
has-miR-628-5p | 15.9749 | −13.82 | ||||||
has-miR-516b | 15.9749 | −17.31 | ||||||
has-miR-498 | 15.9001 | −18.78 | ||||||
has-miR-485-3p | 15.8691 | −19.8 | ||||||
has-miR-660 | 15.8691 | −18.00 | −0.11 | N/A | −14.20 | 0.15 | ||
has-miR-125b | 15.8691 | −16.35 | −0.26 | 0.136 | −16.50 | −0.42 | ||
has-miR-611 | 15.7948 | −25.66 | ||||||
has-miR-623 | 15.7948 | −25.32 | ||||||
has-miR-614 | 15.5842 | −26.73 | ||||||
has-miR-630 | 15.4459 | −20.01 | ||||||
has-miR-891a | 15.3401 | −17.95 | ||||||
has-miR-617 | 15.3401 | −19.32 | ||||||
has-miR-125a-5p | 15.305 | −20.75 | ||||||
has-miR-611 | 15.163 | −25.21 | ||||||
has-miR-410 | 15.097 | −15.24 | ||||||
has-miR-770-5p | 14.9524 | −16.80 |
The microRNAs that targeting ERBB2 were predicted using PicTar, miRanda, TargetScan, and miRBase. MicroRNAs that predicted by at least 3 of the 4 methods were indicated with bold font.