Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 11;37(2):337–343. doi: 10.1007/s00264-012-1609-3

Table 1.

Profile of all posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) cases and summary of clinical and functional outcomes

Case Age (years) Injury Side Mechanism of injury Length of follow-up (months) Interval to surgery (months) Lysholm scale Tegner activity score % of perceived normality IKDC scorea Arthrometer assessed AP translation gradeb
1 25 PCL Left Rugby 58 17 95 8 100 % A A
2 38 PCL Left Football 12 12 91 6 75 % B A
3 27 PCL Right Motor bike 82 5 84 5 80 % C B
4 26 PCL Right Football 36 22 100 7 100 % A A
5 38 PCL Right Football 77 74 95 4 80 % B A
6 20 PCL Right Rugby 24 14 99 7 85 % A B
7 21 PCL Right Ski 25 18 100 8 100 % A A
8 38 PCL Left Rugby 72 27 99 8 95 % A A
9 28 PCL Right Rugby 50 6 99 7 95 % A A
10 35 PCL Left Rugby 16 7 94 8 85 % A A
11 22 PCL Right Football 19 2 100 7 100 % A A
12 24 PCL Left Motor bike 39 4 95 4 80 % B A
13 19 PCL Right Motor bike 14 7 95 8 100 % A A
14 38 PCL Right Football 75 8 15 1 40 % B A
15 30 PCL Right Football 41 12 99 7 85 % A B

International Knee Documentation Committee standard assessment scores

b KT-2000 arthrometer (MED metric™) antero-posterior translation graded according to IKDC standards (Grades: A 0–2 mm, B 3–5 mm, C 6–10 mm and D >10 mm)