Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 5;13:287. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-287

Table 4.

Performance of primer design software for multiple sequence input

Program Number of primers designed Cost (nucleotides) Coverage (bp) Percentage coverage Cost per covered base (nucleotides) Execution time (minutes)*
MCMC-ODPR
1521(1786)
30103
162196
77.37
0.19
637
BatchPrimer3
372(1153)
15427
62292
29.71
0.25
2.98
PAMPS 1205(13598) 25284 39240 18.72 0.64 5.19

MCMC-ODPR was run with 184 sequences for 10,000 iterations with the cost per bases covered and runtime was used as a comparison statistic for performance. MCMC_ODPR outperformed multiple sequence input programs BatchPrimer3 and PAMPS in terms of cost per bases covered, yet was clearly slower in terms of runtime.

Total number of primer sites identified shown in parentheses.

* MCMC-ODPR Execution was performed on a 2.26 GHz Intel® Core 2 Duo MacBook running Mac OS X version 10.6.8 with 2 GB RAM. Execution time for BatchPrimer 3 was provided by the BatchPrimer3 web server (primer design server 1) found at http://probes.pw.usda.gov/batchprimer3/. Execution for PAMPS was performed on a 2.31 GHz AMD Phenomtm 8650 Triple-Core Processor PC running Windows XP with 3.5 GB of RAM.