Table 7.
Correspondence between the concepts used in this paper and three reviews
|
Reviews |
Dane and Schneider [[2]] |
Dusenbury et al. [[1]] |
Durlak et al. [[3]] |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legrand et al. | ||||
|
Intervention dose |
Integrity or Fidelity including 5 components :
exposure, adherence, quality of delivery,
programme differentiation, participant
responsiveness |
Fidelity including 5 components:
adherence, dose, quality of delivery,
programme differentiation, participant
responsiveness |
Including 8 coas mponents:
Fidelity, Dosage, Quality,
Participant responsiveness,
Programme differentiation,
Contamination,
Programme reach,
Programme modification |
|
|
Delivery |
Quantity |
Exposure |
Dose |
Dosage |
| |
|
|
|
Fidelity (a k a : adherence or
compliance or integrity, or
faithful replication) |
| |
|
Adherence |
Adherence |
|
| |
Quality |
Quality of delivery, Adherence |
Quality of delivery, Adherence |
Quality |
|
Participation |
Quantity |
Participant responsiveness |
Participant responsiveness |
Programme reach |
| |
Quality |
Participant responsiveness |
Participant responsiveness |
Participant responsiveness |
|
Participants/ sources of
information |
Supervisors |
Supervisors, |
|
|
| |
|
Developers |
|
|
| |
|
Facilitators |
|
|
| |
Anchors personnel
(providers / receivers) |
Implementers (receivers) or providers |
Providers |
Providers |
| |
Targets |
Participants |
|
|
|
IRG |
/ |
/ |
/ |
|
|
Indicators |
Non-programme-
driven activities |
/ |
/ |
/ |
| Programme-driven activities | / | / | / | |