Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Evolution. 2012 Jan 12;66(5):1308–1321. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01547.x

Table 2.

(A) Colonization experiments with superior numbers of nonnative Vibrio fischeri ES114 (2:1, 5:1, 10:1) over native V. fischeri ET401 in Euprymna tasmanica. (B) Headstart advantage (12 h) of nonnative V. fischeri ES114 over native V. fischeri ET401. Total inoculum of both strains in artificial seawater is 1 × 103 CFUs/mL. Squid hatchlings were sacrificed at 48 h for enumeration of V. fischeri. Letters indicate significant differences using fixed-treatment analysis of variance (P < 0.05, α = 0.05).

Treatment (n=20) Percent Vibrio fischeri ES114 (nonnative)
(A) Nonnative superior numbers in Euprymna tasmanica.
 Axenic squid 0
 ES114 positive control 100
 ET401 positive control 0
 1:1 ES114:ET401 5.4A
 2:1 ES114:ET401 15.2B
 5:1 ES114:ET401 65.7C
 10:1 ES114:ET401 98.2D
(B) Nonnative headstart in E. tasmanica.
 Axenic squid 0
 ES114 positive control 100
 ET401 positive control 0
 1:1 ES114:ET401 7.6A
 ET401+12 h ES114 0
 ES114+12 h ET401 100B